why how does it make a difference ?
so the options I see are1) ask court to set aside the order they had made in vacating the hearing - guess I will have to pay further £255and what happens then - only the counterclaim is heard ?2) do nothng now and may be issue a fresh claim later (but within 6 years) to get my deposit of 2k back?if I do this, I believe claimant will counterclaim for the rent arrears ?
was LL 'gaming the system' by serving me and the court the bundle just 48hrs before, so that if his claim is not going to be heard, counterclaim was also not going to be
Can I just print whatever the bundle Claimant had already submitted in email as it has all what I need
Judge mentions that I am now 'Part20 claimant' - what does it mean - does it mean I need to pay another fee now (same fee Claimant failed to pay as 'hearing fee)
but I think he got a Barrister, as he himself during the hearing asked me to get in touch
then did not find the electronic bundle).Next hearing going to be at the courts I think, so I will make sure I have three copies of the bundle. so, hope, it goes well.
Quotebut I think he got a Barrister, as he himself during the hearing asked me to get in touchQuote The second "he" here is a bit dangling. I don't know if you're referring to the landlord or the barrister.Barrister KTC. Thanks again btw.I will read though the links...one other question..am I allowed now to bring additional claim against the landlord for breaching the covenant to my quiet enjoyment by being physically threatening during the tenancy and for harrasing for rent arrears because he failed to see the payments I made ?or is it advisable to wait and only do a counterclaim if he re-instates his vacated claim or brings another fresh claim...I really like to teach this landlord who owns more than one property and uses all the tricks in the game to get what he wants to learn to respect the law.
The second "he" here is a bit dangling. I don't know if you're referring to the landlord or the barrister.